<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Won the &#8216;West Wing&#8217; Live Debate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thicke.org/archives/2005/11/07/who-won-the-west-wing-live-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thicke.org/archives/2005/11/07/who-won-the-west-wing-live-debate/</link>
	<description>An aggregate of Marc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:24:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.thicke.org/archives/2005/11/07/who-won-the-west-wing-live-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-2452</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 01:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thicke.org/?p=569#comment-2452</guid>
		<description>Brandon - You&#039;ll notice I deleted my response.  Not because I was wrong (which I was).  I admit I was probably wrong in the argument.  You&#039;ve got mail.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon &#8211; You&#8217;ll notice I deleted my response.  Not because I was wrong (which I was).  I admit I was probably wrong in the argument.  You&#8217;ve got mail.  <img src='http://www.thicke.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.thicke.org/archives/2005/11/07/who-won-the-west-wing-live-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-2451</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 01:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thicke.org/?p=569#comment-2451</guid>
		<description>Nope, but as far as I am concerned the trackback is for when you reference someone else&#039;s work.  I saw there was a trackback on my post so I thought I would see something about it on your blog.  But instead there wasn&#039;t even a mention or a link or anything.  That&#039;s how I use trackbacks. That&#039;s all I&#039;m saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, but as far as I am concerned the trackback is for when you reference someone else&#8217;s work.  I saw there was a trackback on my post so I thought I would see something about it on your blog.  But instead there wasn&#8217;t even a mention or a link or anything.  That&#8217;s how I use trackbacks. That&#8217;s all I&#8217;m saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.thicke.org/archives/2005/11/07/who-won-the-west-wing-live-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-2449</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thicke.org/?p=569#comment-2449</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it is that far fetched that a candidate like Vinnick could get the nomination.  John McCain is very similar and he is considered a leading candidate for 2008.  McCain isn&#039;t pro-choice like Vinnick is supposed to be, but he isn&#039;t exactly pro-life in the way that most christian conservatives want him to be either.

To the author of this blog, if you are going to leave a trackback on my blog, please at least give me a link.  Your welcome for your free advertising.  I&#039;ll leave your trackback instead of deleting it like the spam that it is because I just put my link down with this comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it is that far fetched that a candidate like Vinnick could get the nomination.  John McCain is very similar and he is considered a leading candidate for 2008.  McCain isn&#8217;t pro-choice like Vinnick is supposed to be, but he isn&#8217;t exactly pro-life in the way that most christian conservatives want him to be either.</p>
<p>To the author of this blog, if you are going to leave a trackback on my blog, please at least give me a link.  Your welcome for your free advertising.  I&#8217;ll leave your trackback instead of deleting it like the spam that it is because I just put my link down with this comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.thicke.org/archives/2005/11/07/who-won-the-west-wing-live-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-2448</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thicke.org/?p=569#comment-2448</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;By the way — thanks for the plug (on another thread)!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

No problem Father.  It&#039;s an honor to have you commenting on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>By the way — thanks for the plug (on another thread)!</p></blockquote>
<p>No problem Father.  It&#8217;s an honor to have you commenting on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr Martin Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.thicke.org/archives/2005/11/07/who-won-the-west-wing-live-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-2447</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr Martin Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thicke.org/?p=569#comment-2447</guid>
		<description>I watched it too -- I have to admit, conceding all the show&#039;s flaws, I do enjoy &quot;West Wing&quot;; despite all its biases, it is remarkably good at depicting politics; something TV and movies do laughably badly.

But this season has represented a sort of streaming fantasy on the part of Hollywood and other elite leftists: the sort of matchup of GOP and Dem candidates that they dream of. And it is rather laughable at times, and detracts substantially from WW&#039;s realism about politics. To wit: the odds of someone like the Alan Alda character getting the nomination are so long as to be laughable. Then there&#039;s the underlying fantasy that the nation is contentedly pro-abortion. What planet do the creators of this show telecommute from?

By the way -- thanks for the plug (on another thread)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched it too &#8212; I have to admit, conceding all the show&#8217;s flaws, I do enjoy &#8220;West Wing&#8221;; despite all its biases, it is remarkably good at depicting politics; something TV and movies do laughably badly.</p>
<p>But this season has represented a sort of streaming fantasy on the part of Hollywood and other elite leftists: the sort of matchup of GOP and Dem candidates that they dream of. And it is rather laughable at times, and detracts substantially from WW&#8217;s realism about politics. To wit: the odds of someone like the Alan Alda character getting the nomination are so long as to be laughable. Then there&#8217;s the underlying fantasy that the nation is contentedly pro-abortion. What planet do the creators of this show telecommute from?</p>
<p>By the way &#8212; thanks for the plug (on another thread)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila Bryant</title>
		<link>http://www.thicke.org/archives/2005/11/07/who-won-the-west-wing-live-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-2446</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thicke.org/?p=569#comment-2446</guid>
		<description>Well as a West Winf FANatic...even though this isn&#039;t REAL...it was entertaining.   By the way...even ZOGBY got in the act...duuuuh.  
http://zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=12168</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well as a West Winf FANatic&#8230;even though this isn&#8217;t REAL&#8230;it was entertaining.   By the way&#8230;even ZOGBY got in the act&#8230;duuuuh.<br />
<a href="http://zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=12168" rel="nofollow">http://zogby.com/Soundbites/ReadClips.dbm?ID=12168</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mean Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.thicke.org/archives/2005/11/07/who-won-the-west-wing-live-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-2445</link>
		<dc:creator>Mean Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 17:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thicke.org/?p=569#comment-2445</guid>
		<description>Y&#039;know, that&#039;s so funny - I wrote almost the same sentiment on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogs4god.com/node/688&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my blog&lt;/a&gt;:
Who won the debate? Who cares? The show isn&#039;t real, the issues are out of date and so long as Hollywood is unabashedly and unapologetically in lock step with the left why should I allow them to define the terms of the debate - live or otherwise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;know, that&#8217;s so funny &#8211; I wrote almost the same sentiment on <a href="http://www.blogs4god.com/node/688" rel="nofollow">my blog</a>:<br />
Who won the debate? Who cares? The show isn&#8217;t real, the issues are out of date and so long as Hollywood is unabashedly and unapologetically in lock step with the left why should I allow them to define the terms of the debate &#8211; live or otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

